1. give the candy to dave and they me i we 2. peter didn't know was his. whichever which whomever who 3. my interest was when i found out he was a chess player. piqued / world-class peaked / world class peeked / world-class 4. i gave plenty of time to get to the party. himself herself yourself myself 5. my husband played football very good while well too 6. for all the test is over. intensive porpoises intents and purposes intensive purposes 7. she received a b on her english paper because she forgot to her sources. sight cite site resight

The answers to these questions would be, as follows:

1. Give the candy to Dave and I. This is the correct answer because the "I" is establishing the individuality within the duo and because the sentence speaks about two specific individuals within the duo.

2. Peter didn´t know which was his. This is because it is talking about a choice and also specificity within the choice. When talking about possibilities, or choices that must be selected by someone, the word which is used.

3. My interest was peaked when I found out he was a world class player. This is the correct choice because peaked is used when talking about catching someone´s interest, and also because world class does not need to be hyphenated.

4. I gave myself plenty of time to get to the party. This is because the sentence is speaking about the first person, therefore, since the pronoun is I, the word to choose is myself.

5. My husband played football very well. It is grammatically the best choice. Although some people confuse it with good, well, is the correct choice.

6. For all intents and purposes, the test is over. This is the correct way of the expression.

7. She received a B on her English paper because she forgot to cite her sources. This is the correct word to fit the context, because of its meaning.

- self-esteem and a clear goal for writing

- financial security

- a room to be alone

the speech this question is referring to is president kennedy's special message to the congress on urgent national needs, may 25, 1961

kennedy responds in a very direct and concrete way to those thinking that communism is a positive system:

"yet their aggression is more often concealed than open. they have fired no missiles; and their troops are seldom seen. they send arms, agitators, aid, technicians and propaganda to every troubled area. but where fighting is required, it is usually done by others--by guerrillas striking at night, by assassins striking alone--assassins who have taken the lives of four thousand civil officers in the last twelve months in vietnam alone--by subversives and saboteurs and insurrectionists, who in some cases control whole areas inside of independent nations." (kennedy)

president kennedy presents communism as cowardly, as a hidden and treacherous weapon that strikes from the shadows like thieves, he represents the system as not even being capable of showing and open and overt attack or confrontation. to finish up the response, he expresses that the system attacks even a country's idependence and freedom.